<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2012/04/03/after-final-consideration-pilot-afcp/</loc><lastmod>2012-04-03T18:10:20+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2012/03/26/private-pair-tool-released-for-downloading-pair-documents-beta/</loc><lastmod>2012-03-27T01:10:06+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2011/02/17/publication-of-patent-applications/</loc><lastmod>2011-02-17T18:10:42+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2011/01/12/are-provisional-patent-applications-published/</loc><lastmod>2011-01-12T20:45:00+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/09/20/good-usa-today-article-on-copycats/</loc><lastmod>2010-09-20T14:17:30+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/09/08/patent-offices-data-visualization-center/</loc><lastmod>2010-09-08T15:10:02+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/04/21/post-it-notes-30th-anniversary/</loc><lastmod>2010-04-21T19:14:58+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/04/07/uspto-proposes-12-month-extension-to-the-12-month-provisional-application-period/</loc><lastmod>2010-04-07T14:45:06+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/03/12/amazon-one-click-patent-passes-reexamination/</loc><lastmod>2010-03-12T21:23:36+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/03/09/patent-reform-act-of-2010/</loc><lastmod>2010-03-09T17:33:25+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2010/01/05/false-marking-statute-decision-fine-is-for-falsely-marking-articles-with-a-patent-number-on-a-per-article-basis/</loc><lastmod>2010-01-05T18:44:14+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/12/27/international-patents/</loc><lastmod>2009-12-27T19:24:23+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/12/25/invention-timeline/</loc><lastmod>2009-12-26T00:49:40+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/12/12/how-to-protect-your-trade-secrets-inc-com-article/</loc><lastmod>2009-12-13T00:24:21+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/12/08/uspto-unveils-new-initiative-to-accelerate-examination-of-green-technologies/</loc><lastmod>2009-12-08T15:12:37+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/12/02/google-receives-patent-for-enhanced-search-results/</loc><lastmod>2009-12-02T20:47:50+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/about/</loc><lastmod>2009-12-01T03:07:14+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>weekly</changefreq><priority>0.6</priority></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/30/google-scholar-released-free-online-legal-research-tool/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-30T20:13:54+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/24/ford-ordered-to-pay-55-7-million-to-inventor-krippelz-v-ford-motor-co/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-24T19:33:57+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/23/google-books-settlement-receives-preliminary-approval/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-24T01:01:05+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/20/how-to-patent-an-invention/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-21T03:30:47+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/14/appeal-of-tafas-v-kappos-dismissed/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-14T22:24:38+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/12/uspto-directors-new-blog/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-12T22:56:13+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/11/02/pair-master-beta-released/</loc><lastmod>2009-11-02T19:07:31+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/10/15/uspto-grants-600000th-design-patent/</loc><lastmod>2009-10-15T14:54:00+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/10/13/patent-owner-must-sue-contractor-for-u-s-government-in-court-of-federal-claims/</loc><lastmod>2009-10-13T15:08:47+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/10/08/uspto-rescinds-controversial-proposed-patent-regulations/</loc><lastmod>2009-10-09T02:08:26+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/08/13/microsoft-ordered-to-stop-selling-ms-word/</loc><lastmod>2009-10-01T05:00:08+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/09/30/uspto-proposes-significant-changes-to-examiner-count-system/</loc><lastmod>2009-10-01T04:10:32+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/09/17/interactive-chart-on-how-patents-have-shaped-american-history/</loc><lastmod>2009-09-17T18:39:39+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/09/16/uspto-online-chat-session-91609/</loc><lastmod>2009-09-16T17:06:12+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/09/04/google-awarded-design-patent-for-interface-us-d599372/</loc><lastmod>2009-09-11T13:53:34+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/08/26/uspto-issues-interim-guidelines-for-35-u-s-c-101/</loc><lastmod>2009-08-26T14:15:48+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/08/25/new-uspto-director-patent-quality-does-not-equal-rejection/</loc><lastmod>2009-08-25T17:31:59+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/08/07/david-kappos-confirmed-as-new-director-of-the-u-s-patent-trademark-office-uspto/</loc><lastmod>2009-08-07T17:53:09+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/07/22/uspto-announces-e-office-action-program/</loc><lastmod>2009-07-22T16:03:30+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/07/17/84-of-patent-applications-filed-in-2007-are-still-pending/</loc><lastmod>2009-07-17T16:02:36+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/07/13/benefits-of-using-provisional-patent-applications-for-inventors-and-small-businesses/</loc><lastmod>2009-07-14T02:55:48+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/07/07/federal-circuit-agrees-to-rehear-controversial-tafas-v-doll/</loc><lastmod>2009-07-07T14:03:59+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/07/02/michael-jackson-patent/</loc><lastmod>2009-07-02T17:55:54+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/06/24/barack-obama-nominates-david-kappos-as-new-uspto-director/</loc><lastmod>2009-06-24T17:31:36+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/06/24/uspto-revenue-dropping/</loc><lastmod>2009-06-24T17:14:44+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/06/13/bpai-reports-dramatic-rise-in-appeals-in-january-2009/</loc><lastmod>2009-06-13T15:53:11+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/06/02/supreme-court-to-review-bilski-case/</loc><lastmod>2009-06-02T16:59:30+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/04/13/microsoft-ordered-to-pay-uniloc-388-million-for-patent-infringement/</loc><lastmod>2009-04-13T16:35:39+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/04/10/patent-reform-first-to-file/</loc><lastmod>2009-04-10T19:50:01+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/04/08/obvious-to-try-doctrine-used-by-federal-circuit-in-re-kubin/</loc><lastmod>2009-04-09T00:42:55+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/04/07/reduce-taxes-deducting-rd-expenses/</loc><lastmod>2011-02-07T19:09:37+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/2009/04/06/federal-circuit-case-assignment-agreement-did-not-explicity-assign-continuation-in-part-application/</loc><lastmod>2009-04-07T00:47:32+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>monthly</changefreq></url><url><loc>http://inventlaw.com/</loc><changefreq>daily</changefreq><priority>1.0</priority><lastmod>2012-04-03T18:10:20+00:00</lastmod></url></urlset>

